to extract false confessions. The movie goes into detailed accounts of the thoughts of the originators and the zealous adherents of such practices. Relying on cases of wrongful convictions and arguments from legal experts, the movie questions the legitimacy of the practices, the accountability of criminal justice officials, and the long term consequences of innocence lost. I think you will have plenty of thoughts but as usual, here are some questions to consider. Would you confess to a crime you did not commit? Should police officers have the right to lie in order to obtain the truth? Should police and prosecutors have the right to immunity if they send the wrong person to prison? Is compensation justified? Can you think of any alternatives if monetary compensation is not enough?
Should police and prosecutors have the right to immunity if they send the wrong person to prison? Is compensation justified?
